Highly Experienced Puget Sound Appellate Attorneys
Even judges can make poor decisions. When one of these decisions prevents you from moving forward with your life, you may want to appeal the ruling. If you disagree with a judge's decision, hire an attorney with extensive experience representing clients in appeals. Contact The Law Office of Catherine C. Clark at 888-819-0420 to schedule a consultation.
Appealing a Real Estate Judgment or Other Ruling
Located in Seattle, Washington, our firm can help you appeal a real estate-related judgment or any other civil ruling. We like a challenge. Our founding attorney, Catherine C. Clark, has done appellate work for her entire career. Catherine and her skilled team will put her nearly 20 years of experience to work for you to appeal the ruling, and help you move on with your life.
We Don't Do Easy
Easy cases don't need the attention of the appellate court. Call 888-819-0420 or contact us online to schedule a consultation to discuss your appeal. Our lawyers will work tirelessly to resolve the conflict in your favor.
Our Appellate Decisions
Kubec v. Zuluaga, No. 54091-2-I (July 5, 2005, Unpublished Opinion) (Successful defense of summary judgment awarding purchaser client damages and attorney fees against seller relating to seller's fraud and misrepresentation relating to real property)
City of Lynnwood v. Video Only, Inc. 118 Wn. App. 674, 77 P.3d 378 (2003), review denied January 7, 2004 (Successfully argued in a challenge to public use and necessity in an eminent domain action that the project must be considered as a whole and not be limited to the single property named in the suit)
Currin v. Raff, No. 50557-2-I (April 21, 2003, Unpublished Opinion), review denied, December 2, 2003 (Successful defense of restraining order against neighbor preventing trespass and summary judgment quieting title against neighbor's claims of adverse possession)
Peterson v. Rayfield, No. 49527-5-I (September 3, 2002, Unpublished Opinion) (Successful defense of verdict in favor of our interpretation of roadway maintenance agreement which interpretation did not restrict development of client's property)
Sattler v. Northwest Tissue Center, 110 Wn. App. 689, 42 P.3d 440 (No. 48157-6-I March 18, 2002, review denied October 29, 2002) (Reversal of trial court dismissal on summary judgment – case involves the Uniform Anatomical Gifts Act)
Gaylord v. Snohomish County, et al., No. 46663-1-I (November 26, 2001, Unpublished Decision) (Successful defense against attorney fees claim by Snohomish County under Land Use Petition Act)
Faulkner v. Racquetwood Village Condominium Association, et al., 106 Wn. App. 483, 23 P.3d 1135 (June 4, 2001), review denied (December 2001) (Successful defense of condominium unit owner against claim by crime victim and homeowners' association for damages from a crime which originated in common area of condominium)
M.A. Mortenson Company, Inc. v. Timberline Software Corporation, et al., 140 Wn.2d 568, 998 P.2d 305 (May 4, 2000) (First case in Washington on the efficacy of software licensing agreements)
Neckas v. Holt, 96 Wn. App. 1009 (June 21, 1999, Unpublished Opinion) review denied, 139 Wn.2d 1024 (February 8, 2000) (Successful defense of appeal from trial court award to client – case involved adverse possession claim by neighbor).
